- Media Alert
Media Alert: Pembroke by-election: Candidates Forum
Media Enquiries
Sophie Underwood
PMAT State Director
sophie_underwood@hotmail.com
0407 501 999
Please share:
Pembroke by-election: Candidates Forum Tues 31st October
The Planning Matters Alliance Tasmania will host a forum featuring candidates vying for the Legislative Council seat of Pembroke at this weekend’s by-election. The forum will focus on issues relating the Statewide Planning Scheme and the candidates’ vision for how planning affects development decisions for Pembroke in the future.
All seven candidates have been invited, with five accepting to appear in person. Green’s candidate Bill Harvey is unavailable, but has accepted an invitation to send a representative. Liberal candidate James Walker is also unavailable and is yet to respond to the invitation to nominate a representative.
Given the complexity of planning laws and reforms, and to assist with consistency, all candidates have been requested to address five specific questions, sent to them in advance.
Candidates forum – Planning Matters
Where: Rosny Park Bowls Club
40 Bastick St, Rosny
When: Tuesday 31st October 2016
6 pm
More Information: Sophie Underwood – 0407 501 999
Specific candidate questions below
FIVE QUESTIONS
- Planning is ultimately about having a vision for well-designed, liveable communities. Describe your vision for Pembroke.
- Under the Statewide Planning Scheme, local area plans can be used to set special rules for areas that have “particular environmental, economic, social or spatial qualities that require provisions that are unique to the area of land”. What are some of the areas within Pembroke that you think would warrant special rules?
- In its recommendations on the State Planning Provisions, the Tasmanian Planning Commission urged the government to review, as a matter of priority, the impacts of Planning Directive 4.11(commonly called PD 4.1) which provides for reduced lot sizes, higher densities and reduced setbacks across most residential areas. Would you support this review being carried out before the Statewide Planning Scheme takes effect?
- Do you support or oppose these projects being declared a major project and taken out of the normal council assessment process:
− The proposed tourist development on Rosny Hill
− The golf resort at seven mile beach that was refused by the Clarence City Council in 2014
− Fragrance skyscrapers proposed for Hobart and Launceston
- If you were to develop a suite of state planning policies2, what would be your priority topics?
1The Act allows the Minister for Planning and Local Government to issue planning directives. A planning directive provides direction on planning matters, including standards that must be included in all planning schemes. Planning Directive 4.1 can be viewed here. Those standards overrode existing provisions, and reduced the minimum lot sizes and setback provisions and increased density in all residential areas, whether in central Hobart or downtown Cygnet. The content of Planning Directive4.1 has been copied almost unchanged into State Planning Provisions.
2State Policies describe the Government’s position on issues of sustainable development. They are policies about: land use planning, land management, environmental management, and environment protection. Tasmania currently only has three state policies: Tasmanian State Coastal Policy 1996, State Policy on Water Quality Management 1997 & State Policy on Protection of Agricultural Land 2009. PMAT’s platform document, which outlines the six key principles that PMAT believes must underpin Tasmania’s planning system, calls for a strategic planning system by establishing and implementing a community endorsed, sustainable, long-term strategic vision for Tasmania by creating a range of state and/or regional Policies. Examples include affordable housing, biodiversity, fire management, climate change, coastal development, energy efficiency. For the full list of examples, see ‘footnote d’ of PMAT’s platform document.
Related News & Media
Mercury Letter to the Editor: Proper Process Key to Public Confidence
Legislative Councillor Ruth Forrest is right when she says “proper process is important”. When it is ignored or abused, people’s confidence in institutions is undermined,
ABC News: Tasmanian government fails to pass development assessment panels bill, which tries to bypass councils
Independent Murchison MLC Ruth Forrest said while she supported the principle of development assessment panels, the government had failed to consult properly with councils.”What I’ve
Letter to the Editor: DAPs unnecessary – Writes PMAT President
“DAPs are unnecessary – even the government’s own 2023 Position Paper states that Tasmania’s approval times for developments are the fastest in Australia.
PMAT Media Release: Proposed Development Assessment Panel legislation opposed by community, Local Governments and Tasmanian Planning Commission – parliament needs to vote down the DAP legislation
Proposed Development Assessment Panel legislation opposed by community, Local Governments and Tasmanian Planning Commission – parliament needs to vote down the DAP legislation
Support Us
Receive News & Updates from PMAT
Stay informed on what’s happening locally and statewide within Tasmania, and join our community in advocating to protect Tasmania’s future.